In some countries young people have little leisure time and are under a lot of pressure to work hard in their studies. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Nowadays, there is a cut throat competition from the beginning when a kid starts going school to getting admission in college and then for a job in a multinational company. It arouses a lot of pressure on youths to work hard in thier studies and thus, they get little time for their leisure activities.

Most importantly, the increasing competition shows the lack of school, colleges and other resources with respect to increasing population and other thing is our education system which focuses on working hard on studies and have no or very less significance of other activities like games. There are very few government seats in schools and colleges and to get selected for those seats among thousands of students is a big challenge. Therefore, to win this battle, students have to work hard and sacrifice their free time to studies.

However, it is equally important ,as studies, to have some free time for relaxation, refreshment and other physical activities which helps them to grow mentally and physically fit. Secondly, the education system which mainly focuses on studies and has very less significance to other activities. No doubt that education is necessary but the way it is carried to students is equally important. It should be in innovative ways and receptive to new ideas so that students could enjoy while learning instead of taking it as a burden or feel pressurized for it.

Thus, in such a way, if students are gaining knowledge while playing or via interesting experiments, the difference between leisure and studies time will go off. Additionally, parents and society are also responsible of this situation of youths today. Some parents show off and compare their children’s grade with other in a society and to maintain the best status they exert pressure on their kids irrespective of their interests in studies. Youths are the only sufferer who put all their effort to accomplish their parents’ dream and to live in society with pride.

So the big question is where this situation is leading to and who are affected by this ? Of course, first of all, our young generation who are in this situation and sometimes, they are so burdened that they commit suicide with the fear of failing and in depression. Next, the country whose future depends upon its young generation and if it leads to a tough side then surely it is not going to progress. Furthermore, The solution lies in problems and definitely, we need to increase number of schools and colleges and provide free education to educate more and more people.

At the same time we need to maintain the same standards in all the schools and colleges so that there will no differentiation among children from different institutes. Additionally, there is need to have some amendments in education system to make it interesting and experimental. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. Nowadays students can choose what type of academics they want to learn.

Some of them prefer to develop their knowledge in history and literature. However others want to study science and math rather than humanities. The issue what field of science is more important is a very controversial one. Personally, I think that both options have its advantages. From my point, each student has to learn history, literature as well as science and math on basic level. But they can advance in certain knowledge afterwards according to their own talents and preferences. In the following paragraphs I will mention reasons of my opinion. First of all, learning history and literature extend our awareness of umankind past and cultural development. Students have to know about their ancestors and their cultural achievements. Moreover, literature introduces them to moral and ethical examples of people behavior as far as a spiritual and humanistic progress. Classical literature masterpieces inspire us to think over main values of humankind. Second of all, our contemporary world develops due to the progress of science and math. There is no business that can work without calculation and analysis. That is why students should not avoid learning basic knowledge in science and math because it might be helpful in their future success in business.

We cannot imagine the modern life without technologies which embrace all parts of our lives. It would be better to be aware of technological principles which are based on science and math. Thirdly, I think that students would like to develop their intellect and extend their knowledge because the contemporary progress needs intelligent people who are able to accomplish different kind of tasks at the same time and succeed in different social aims. People who have extended minds and high intelligence are more efficient in life and in business.

They easy can find their knowledge application and adapt to changing society needs. In conclusion, I must point out that I disagree with the statement that history and literature are more important than science and mathematics. I believe that each of them bring benefits in our lives. Therefore each of those fields must be studied in schools because in our modern society we have to know about the humankind history and cultural achievements as well as the progress in science and mathematics. It is very clear now that English should be the primary foreign language taught in all schools around the world.

Learning a different language before English is, in today’s world, a waste of time. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? English has become the most significant language in the world. Due to this fact studying English as a foreign language dominates over the other languages which last time are considered to be useless in a modern life. I absolutely agree with this point of view. First of all, it is well-known, that the most respectable and popular higher educational establishments and business schools in the world held education process in English.

That is mean if you are going to enter such university as Oxford, Cambridge or take MBI course you definitely should have an excellent English proficiency. This necessary condition is almost impossible if you studied another foreign language at school. Secondly, English is recognized as a language of business world. International trades, logistics and manufacturing require English-speaking specialists because all these fields exist and improve due to the international communications and experience. Such exchange of skills and knowledge is possible because there is the one common language which is understood in all countries.

If you want to be involved into successful business process, to get well-paid job and to have opportunity to be appreciated and promoted you have to speak exactly English well. Thirdly, nowadays English is vital for travelling. Tourism industry is constantly growing and English-speaking personnel serves you not only in the biggest and top hotels, but also in small hotels which are situated at the edge of world. Moreover, many countries introduce the system of English names of streets, subway and bus stations and tourist attractions what makes easier for tourists to find right place during traveling.

For these reasons mentioned above I think that studying English as a foreign language at school is substantial and obviously so children should not spend their time on learning other languages which is not so important. __________________ Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. Nowadays students can choose what type of academics they want to learn. Some of them prefer to develop their knowledge in history and literature.

However others want to study science and math rather than humanities. The issue what field of science is more important is a very controversial one. Personally, I think that both options have its advantages. From my point, each student has to learn history, literature as well as science and math on basic level. But they can advance in certain knowledge afterwards according to their own talents and preferences. In the following paragraphs I will mention reasons of my opinion. First of all, learning history and literature extend our awareness of humankind past and cultural development.

Students have to know about their ancestors and their cultural achievements. Moreover, literature introduces them to moral and ethical examples of people behavior as far as a spiritual and humanistic progress. Classical literature masterpieces inspire us to think over main values of humankind. Second of all, our contemporary world develops due to the progress of science and math. There is no business that can work without calculation and analysis. That is why students should not avoid learning basic knowledge in science and math because it might be helpful in their future success in business.

We cannot imagine the modern life without technologies which embrace all parts of our lives. It would be better to be aware of technological principles which are based on science and math. Thirdly, I think that students would like to develop their intellect and extend their knowledge because the contemporary progress needs intelligent people who are able to accomplish different kind of tasks at the same time and succeed in different social aims. People who have extended minds and high intelligence are more efficient in life and in business. They easy can find their knowledge application and adapt to changing society needs.

In conclusion, I must point out that I disagree with the statement that history and literature are more important than science and mathematics. I believe that each of them bring benefits in our lives. Therefore each of those fields must be studied in schools because in our modern society we have to know about the humankind history and cultural achievements as well as the progress in science and mathematics. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

The priority of technical disciplines over humanitarians in the tertiary education has been widely discussed in the recent years. Reduction in number and variety of humanitarian classes offered by colleges and universities became the subject of great concern in modern society. Although according to late statistics more and more young people are choosing to get a degree in history or literature. It is hard to understate the importance of history and literature in the personal development. In contradistinction to natural science which is based solely on empirical approach history is purely analytical.

Students learn to recognize crusial consequences of famous historical events and different regimes. Knowing the past helps to forsee the future. Literature, on the other hand, inspires imagination and creative thinking (e. g. Alice in Wonderland, Lord of the Rings) and raises moral dilemmas(e. g. Dead Souls, Fathers and Sons). However, mathematical and scientific discoveries made incredible technical progress of the last century possible. To this findings we owe the space rockets, television, computers, Internet, life expectancy doubling. The first web camera was invented in the science department of Cambridge University.

Also I believe that conducting experiments for science assignment helps students to become observers, to see and understand the world around them deeper, in the same way that solving the equations helps to develop strong deduction and reasoning skills. Taking into account everything mentioned above I am inclined to believe that science and mathematics are important subjects to study, but history and literature are essential for young people’s moral development, because science discoveries and technological progress became dangerous without moral and impossible without creativity.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. The priority of technical disciplines over humanitarians in the tertiary education has been widely discussed in the recent years. Reduction in number and variety of humanitarian classes offered by colleges and universities became the subject of great concern in modern society. Although according to late statistics more and more young people are choosing to get a degree in history or literature.

It is hard to understate the importance of history and literature in the personal development. In contradistinction to natural science which is based solely on empirical approach history is purely analytical. Students learn to recognize crusial consequences of famous historical events and different regimes. Knowing the past helps to forsee the future. Literature, on the other hand, inspires imagination and creative thinking (e. g. Alice in Wonderland, Lord of the Rings) and raises moral dilemmas(e. g. Dead Souls, Fathers and Sons).

However, mathematical and scientific discoveries made incredible technical progress of the last century possible. To this findings we owe the space rockets, television, computers, Internet, life expectancy doubling. The first web camera was invented in the science department of Cambridge University. Also I believe that conducting experiments for science assignment helps students to become observers, to see and understand the world around them deeper, in the same way that solving the equations helps to develop strong deduction and reasoning skills.

Taking into account everything mentioned above I am inclined to believe that science and mathematics are important subjects to study, but history and literature are essential for young people’s moral development, because science discoveries and technological progress became dangerous without moral and impossible without creativity. Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think that this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. It is true that sports stars often earn huge salaries.

While there are some good reasons why this is the case, I personally believe that is wrong for these people to be paid more than other professionals. On the one hand, there are several convincing arguments in favor of sportsmen being paid more than other skilled individuals. First, sport is a very time and effort-demanding occupation. As a rule, a regular sportsman spends about 10 hours a day to keep fit and around 14 hours before going to a competition, which significantly exceeds 8 hours a day – working standard established by the government in most countries.

Second, there is a so called “age limit” in sport. While most best-paid international football and tennis players seem to be relatively young, there are few, if any, sport stars aged 35 and more. Taking the above said into account, it is very unlikely for a sport star to earn fabulous wages throughout his or her whole life. On the other hand, it could be argued that other skilled occupations require less time of efforts. For instance, chief executives or chief financial officers rarely leave their workplace on time with most of their colleagues.

Many of them stay up another few hours so that they can solve all pending questions, many of which require plenty of critical thinking and strategic planning. Furthermore, many people are inclined to believe that such skilled workers as doctors or lawyers make a greater contribution to the society rather than sportsmen do. A surgeon, saving his patient’s life or a barrister, presenting interests of his falsely accused defendant seem to be of greater importance to the state, hence this should be represented in the amount of money these skilled professionals receive.

On the whole, there is undoubtedly a great difference in the amount of money earned by sportspeople and other professional workers. However, it is my firm conviction that salary rates should not depend on the area of your employment and sport professionals should gain the same amount of money, just like the other professionals. Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.

Today’s world has been divided into developing and industrialised countrieswhich the main difference between them is the amount of money that governments apply in important sectors such as education, health and commerce. Most of the poorer nations are buried in debts as a result of their unbalanced finances which are reflect in a failed health care, an unstructured education system and a weak international trade. This vicious cycle will continue indefinitely unless wealthier nations show interest in minimizing the worldwide economic differences, as well as taking more responsibility for assisting unfortunate countries.

Most of the African countries live in sub-human conditions because of the extreme poverty, upheaval, hunger, disease, unemployment, lack of education and both inexperienced and corrupt administrations. The devastating consequences of the AIDS epidemic in those countries could improve if the infected populations receive free drugs to control the disease, have access to health professionals and get information on how to prevent its spread. But this can only be achieved through international help programs in which leaders of the world? s richest countries donate medicine and also send doctors and nurses to treat and educate those in need.

Moreover, most of the poor countries rely on selling agricultural products and raw material to rich nations and buying industrialized products from them resulting in a huge financial deficit. Consequently, they borrow a significant amount of money from the World Bank to try to improve their broken economies, but sometimes the money disappears with no significant changes and they cannot even pay the interest to the bank. Regarding this issue, last year the G8, which is comprised of leaders of the eight richest nations, decided to forgive billions of dollars worth of debt owed by the world? poorest nations. In addition, they developed adequate loan programs to financially assist those countries. In conclusion, leaders of the industrialised countries play an indispensable role in assisting developing nations deal with essential areas such as health, education and trade. Also, their aid is the key to breaking the vicious cycle, which results in poverty and death. Topic 1: It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that for this reason younger workers are to be prefered.

To what extent would or support or reject this idea? 250 words Done In contemporary society, advanced technology has led to achievements in most places, of course, headquarters is not excluded. Therefore, many people, including myself, have an opinion that laborers over fifty cannot adapt to changes in the modern places. First and foremost, most companies require job candidates to have necessary skills such as: presentation, teamwork, computer and English skills. With older workers, there is a greater change that some of these skills have been forgotten since their trainning many decades ago.

Consequently, the government or the companies have to pay a lot of money to re-train old staff. It can not be denied that recruiting young employees is a better choice. Moreover, the over-fifty-year-old workmen face physical problems that make it difficult to memorize new knowledge. For instance: in some modern high tech industries like computer programming, it is easier for younger people to learn a large amount of information. Secondly, the world has been facing a global economy crash. This leads to an increase unemployed workers, not only in developing nations but also in industrialized countries.

For example, in England, the unemployment rate in June of this year was 7. 8%, double that of 2008 according the Labour force survey. Thus, the old workers should retire to create opportunities for younger people who are full of energy and ambition to icrease the benefit for their companies. In conclusion, using younger employees in modern places is better than relying on older workers. Essay 2: Some people believe that children’s leisure activities must be educational, otherwise they are a completely waste of time. Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your experience. Done: Education has played an important role in our society. Many people think that leisure activities also have an educational purpose, others say that they are not necessary. From my point of view, I support the former not only because of psychology but also playing importance. The first reason why educational activities are important is the role they play in developing a child’s psychology. In the first stage of life, babies play with members in their family such as their siblings and parents.

The fact shows that if a child is satisfied with whatever he or she wants, as a consequence, he or she would be bad and has negative reactions unless not receiving what he or she wants in the future. Clearly, the more they grow, the more time they spend with their friends. This helps to form their personality, thus, as parents, teaching sons and daughters to know how to choose or make friends, to share something with others and to learn to cooperate is extremely important. Unless they have many difficulties to intergrate into society. Secondly, playing has an important role in the first stages of life.

Thus, through this activity, teachers or parents could give children more motivation to learn and teach them . In fact, to help pupils memorise knowledge or attract them to lectures, teachers usually give games such as puzzles or through role games, pupils learn more how to show the emotion or feelings of historical characters. Similarly, at home, parents give legends for their children to teach principal values such as: honest, kind-hearted, humane and brave in the life as well as to develop their souls. In conclusion, for kids, leisure activities have to correspond to educational purposes to help them develop as much as possible.

Essay 3: It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that for this reason younger workers are to be preffered. To what extent would or support or reject this idea? 250 words Done In contemporary society, advanced technology has led to achievements in most places, of course, headquarters is not excluded. Therefore, many people, including myself, have an opinion that laborers over fifty cannot adapt to changes in the modern places. First and foremost, most companies require job candidates to have necessary skills such as: presentation, teamwork, computer and English skills.

With older workers, there is a greater change that some of these skills have been forgotten since their trainning many decades ago. Consequently, the government or the companies have to pay a lot of money to re-train old staff. It can not be denied that recruiting young employees is a better choice. Moreover, the over-fifty-year-old workmen face physical problems that make it difficult to memorize new knowledge. For instance: in some modern high tech industries like computer programming, it is easier for younger people to learn a large amount of information.

Secondly, the world has been facing a global economy crash. This leads to an increase unemployed workers, not only in developing nations but also in industrialized countries. For example, in England, the unemployment rate in June of this year was 7. 8%, double that of 2008 according the Labour force survey. Thus, the old workers should retire to create opportunities for younger people who are full of energy and ambition to icrease the benefit for their companies. In conclusion, using younger employees in modern places is better than relying on older workers.

Essay 4: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents or other adult relatives should make important decisions for their (15 to 18 year-old) teenage children. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion • You should write at least 250 words. • You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Done In contemporary society, the individual freedom is paid to attention more and more. Thus, many people think that teens should be fee to give their decisions even milestone in their life. Others say that they are the responsibility of their parents or older relatives.

From my point of view, I completely agree with the former. Noone can denied that children from 15 to 18 passed puberty with a number of physical changes as well as mental ones , for example, a deeper voice and lager adam’apple in boys, and development of breasts and more curved and prominent hips in girls. Similarly, they are mature enough to be entrusted by society with certain taks. For instance, they could drive a vehicle, having sexual relations, serving in the armed forces or on a jury, purchasing and drinking alcohol, voting, entering into contracts, completing certain levels of education, and marrying.

In most countries, from adolescence or sooner, the children have criminal responsibility, for instance, from 7 in India to 18 in Belgium. After reaching the initial age, there may be levels of responsibility dictated by age and type of offense, and crimes committed by minors may be tried in a juvenile court, whereas, in preadolescence, it is responsibility of parents or legal guardians This also their legal working age, in the United Kingdom and Canada, from 14 to 16. Since, they could earn money as part-time or full-time if over 16 to raise themselves or to pay some of their basic needs such as: clothes, shoes and books.

In conclusion, with certain activities that teenagers are accepted by the society. They certainly have ability to decide all relating problems in their life. Topic 1: It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that for this reason younger workers are to be preferred. To what extent would or support or reject this idea? 250 words In contemporary society, advanced technology has led to achievements in most places, of course, headquarters is not excluded.

Therefore, many people, including myself, (you may delete this) have an opinion that laborers over fifty cannot adapt to changes in the modern places. (rephrase it) First and foremost, most companies require job candidates to have necessary skills such as: presentation, teamwork, computer literacy and English skills. With older workers, there is (is-singular; are – plural) a greater change that some of these skills have been forgotten since their training many decades ago. Consequently, the government or the companies have to pay a lot of money to re-train old staff. It can not be denied that recruiting young employees is a better choice.

Moreover, the over-fifty-year-old workmen face physical problems that make it difficult to memorize (remember) new knowledge. For instance, in some modern high tech industries like computer programming, it is easier for younger people to learn a large amount of information. (Please don’t replace comma with a colon) Secondly, the world has been facing a global economic crash. This leads to an increase unemployed workers (increasing number of unemployed workers), not only in developing nations but also in industrialized countries. For example, in England, the unemployment rate in June of this year was 7. %, double that of 2008 according the Labour force survey. Thus, the old workers should retire to create opportunities for younger people who are full of energy and ambition to increase the benefit for their companies. (expound) In conclusion, using younger employees in modern places is better than relying on older workers. (make this longer) Topic: It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that for this reason younger workers are to be preffered. To what extent would or support or reject this idea? 250 words DONE:

These days, headquarters face paced, technologically advanced. Thus, many people say that between a younger candidate and an older employee, the recruited council should choose the former because of their adaptation to the new environment. I completely disagree with this point of view. The first reason why older employees are valuable is that they have accumulated knowledge over many years in the workforce. The fifty-year-old laborers have more life experiences than fresh post-college job prospects. These older employees have the experiences to finish tasks given by the employers more easily.

Similarly, these more experienced individuals also can identify their abilities and choose suitable positions to apply. This is contrary to younger people who apply to any jobs they like, not caring about their qualifications. For instance: www. vietnamworks. com. vn is a reliable website for finding jobs in Vietnam and also helps companies to select the best Cvs for their available positions. This site often complains that there are a large amount of young people who send similar Cvs to all positions that they read on the websites. The second reason, that supports to select older workers, comes from characters of over-fifty workers.

They are more mature and careful than younger workers. Older workers have more experience dealing with problems and troubleshooting to fix them. They may be easier to work with because of previous experience working as part of a team. Also, they are more likely to stay in a job at a company longer as young people move more frequently. The facts show that they always accept their jobs not only in good times, but also in the worst situations. Actually, in this economy crisis, the employers usually choose new workers to let go when cuts need to be made, rather than the older more valuable workforce.

To conclude, a Vietnamese saying goes: the older gingers are, the spicier they are. This is similar in the job force, as older workers possess experiences, characters and deserve to keep the important position in firms. They are impossible to be replaced by the young job seekers. Writing Task 2. Topic #1. (Feel free to answer this question. ) Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of a nation’s history. However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices. How important is it to maintain old buildings?

Should history stand in the way of progress? In recent year, modern constructions have been appeared so much in many places that many people think that it is a better way to have old architectures replaced by new appartements and offices. In this case, I completely support the former. Each country has separate characteristics that are attractive foreigner tourists, for example: France is famous for the Eiffel Towel, Champs- Elysees and Notre- Dame Cathedral, while saying to Big Ben, Buckingham Palace and House of Parliament is as same as mentioning to England.

Also, the people travel to discover differences cultural significances, constructions, living styles of countries, in case without one of them is less interesting of nations. For example: People do not have to go beautiful landmarks because all is same modern styles. Similarly , it makes to decrease profit in tourism that occupies a big part of national economy. Keeping old buildings is synonymic to maintain history, culture, traditions. Clearly, most old architectures are related to history events or fairy stories in the past, since, it is better for pupils to come those places directly, not only through lectures and books.

For instance: The name of Sword Lake in Hanoi was concerned to the fairy story that King Le give sword back the turtle after borrowing it to against Northern invaders. Moreover, constructions also possesses cultures and traditions of periods that they have been experienced. In Hanoi, there are 36 ancient streets that is famous for their composition, eating culture, traditional vocational village that the modern ones cannot have. In conclusion, ancient constructions along with history is always important in every and each era. As a consequence, being a citizen of the world we must keep them as long as possible