Review of Literature Related to Effective Communication and Incident Reporting Systems

Chapter Two: Reappraisal of Literature

Effective Communication

Good communicating has obvious effects, particularly in organisational maps. No affair the section or unit – whether production and operations, finance, and selling, aims are easy facilitated and achieved. The importance of effectual communicating can non be overstated since organisational constructions and relationships depend to a great extent on communicating ( BOMI International, n.d. ) . This is needed to increase productiveness, efficiency and effectivity. Not merely does it ease constructive facets of work procedures, communicating besides averts unwanted or detrimental fortunes ( Cesar-Vaz,, 2012 ) . This is peculiarly true for pass oning policies and patterns that promote wellness and safety and prevent jeopardies. Ineffective communicating may ensue in hurtful effects. There are important costs due to damage to belongings, wellness and insurance coverage, break of work flow, clip and attempt required to react to media and authorities enquiries, resurgence of stakeholder trust and assurance and most particularly the loss of life. Obviously, to vouch favourable conditions, effectual communicating of policies and patterns AIDSs in accomplishing and keeping a safe and healthy work environment. Besides, communicating is recognized as a professional function and duty of applied scientists, who expectedly comprise a good figure of the Drilling and Workover Unit ( Nichols & A ; Weldon, 2015 ) . It is expected that these workers observe the rules of their professions.

Moriarty ( 2001 ) specified that communicating that works possess three features. These are lucidity, completeness, and organisation. BOMI International respects that effectual communicating is wrongly described as merely an understanding between transmitter and receiving system ; alternatively communicating should be lucidity of appreciation ( Cesar-Vaz, , 2012 ; Moriarty, 2001 ) . The receiving systems should “get the message” as the beginning intended. However, lucidity can be compromised both at the directing terminal and the receiving terminal. Cesar-Vaz, et. Al ( 2012 ) referred to this as the differences of the perceptual experience . Meanwhile, completeness is one of the most hard jobs in communicating. In stipulating safety policies or instructions for illustration, it is possible that excessively much information may confound and overload the receiving system. On the other manus, excessively small information may take to a deficiency of counsel and may be capable to making assorted premises and incorrect decisions. Last, the manner a message is put together, both words and visuals, determines how the spectator returns through it. Different parts of the message in the incident study, for case, do different things. The presentation of the information follows a logical flow as a map of organisation ( Moriarty, 2001 ) . When a ground is attempted to be established or a point explained, the logic of the statement must follow clearly from point to indicate. Big leaps in logic, every bit good as faulty logic, can do confusion ( Moriarty, 2001 ; Cesar-Vaz, et. al. , 2012 ) .

BOMI International ( n.d. ) besides stipulated that two stages of the communicating procedure exists. These are the transmittal and feedback stages. During transmittal, information is delivered to the intended receiving systems. In the intent of this research, workers on the oil rig who are supposed to use safety steps are the receiving systems. Safety policies and patterns should be transmitted to them. In the different signifiers and types of information sent to them, the incident study must be transmitted as these contain information that should forbid workers to incur similar errors and avoid hurts. Conversely, the feedback stage indicates a common apprehension from the workers. The receiving system confirms the message and manifests correct reading and possible usage of information.

Poor communicating is identified as one of the factors that contribute to incidences of accidents, hurts, or mistakes in the workplace ( Mahajan, 2010 ; Badi, Nadeau, & A ; Gboddossou, 2011 ) . To counterbalance for the human factors in the communicating procedure such as mental, psychological, and societal barriers ( Moriarty, 2001 ) , policies, guidelines, reminders, studies must be used to forestall mistakes. Written stuffs like manuals, notices, reminders, and studies are tools for conveying thoughts or larning that could inform, steer, remind, or Teach people.

Incident Reporting Systems

Incident describing systems are considered cardinal instruments in guaranting safety at the workplace. Mahajan ( 2010 ) considered these signifiers of communicating as a tool for bettering protection and heightening larning from past inadvertences. These studies gaining control contextual information about mistake instances. Not merely do they function as a agency of supervising events of accidents or hazards in the organisation, its utility besides indicates a beginning of analysis and penetrations for future actions. Therefore, incident studies predict preventable happenings. In a similarly bad industry like the medical pattern as emphasized in Mahajan’s paper, critical incident coverage techniques are found to obtain information which lead to preventable happenings. To recognize the efficaciousness of incident describing systems as learning tools in detecting precautional steps, Mahajan ( 2010 ) enumerated basic activities in incident coverage systems for successful interlingual rendition. These activities involve informations input, informations, analysis, and feedback.

When information in incident studies are communicated efficaciously, this leads to meaningful analysis ( Mahajan, 2010 ) . To ease this, the basic activities should detect the recommended standards and patterns. Data input should be independent and non-punitive. Data independency avoids bias inputs and the inclination to change existent information to avoid reverberations from direction. A narrative of the existent version by the worker involved in the incident depicts the factual nature of the incident. Badi, Nadeau & A ; Gbodossou ( 2011 ) specified including what specifically caused the failure to detect the instructions or methods of work, and the deficiency of preparation or experience. Mistakes besides arise from the inability to esteem established work methods ; which should besides be revealed and documented ( Badi, Nadeau & A ; Gbodossou, 2011 ) . This information should be evaluated and translated into meaningful lessons for everyone ( Mahajan, 2010 ) . The last basic activity, feedback, intends to portion thoughts, take excuses, or direct incrimination. The intent is to guarantee optimal acquisition and apprehension of the happenings of mistakes.

An effectual incident study should be able to supply a elaborate analysis of the series of events that lead to the hurt. The information in this study can be utilized for finding appropriate intercessions at specific points in the concatenation of events ( Mahajan, 2010 ) . Its contents must be able to foreground important information in the probe and supply for analysis.

To conform to the standards of effectual communicating as posited by Moriarty ( 2001 ) , the incident analysis should be clearly defined, investigated, and reported ( Mahajan, 2010 ) . Clarity, completeness, and organisation may be reflected from the inclusion of the followers in the incident study. The most active miscue must be determined which should so be stated in a clear job statement. To farther specify the job, all its parametric quantities must be specified and framed.

The intent of incident describing systems will non be achieved if incidents are non recognized, reported, or documented decently. Another restriction of its usage is that people would non cognize how to analyse the information reflected in these studies. Cultural barriers besides exist as incident studies include disciplinary actions, favoritism, and possible legal effects ( Mahajan, 2010 ) . If these effects are expected strongly, the readying of such studies may wholly be minimized, at worst avoided. As such, organisations should be able to make a positive consequence in utilizing incident describing systems. A civilization of cooperation and practical public-service corporation for incident studies, alternatively of reluctance, should be adopted and emphasized in the organisation ( Childress, 2015 ) . This should be able to back up and heighten the safety civilization of the organisation.

Related Post

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *