Marbury v. Madison

Marbury v. Madison Essay Sample


The case “Marbury v. Madison began on March, 1801, when a Proponent, William Marbury, was assigned as a magistrate in the District of Columbia. William Marbury and various others were constituted to government posts made by United States Congress in the last days of President John Adams’s administration; merely these eleventh hour appointments were never completely nailed down. The dissatisfied appointees raised an act of US Congress and litigated for their jobs in the Supreme



In a the year of 1803 a watershed case, Marbury v. Madison, John Marshal Chief Justice’s opinion founded the Supreme Court’s power to declare acts of United States Congress, and by significance acts of the president, unconstitutional if they surpassed the authorities allowed by the Establishment or Constitution. But most significant thing was that the Court became the judge of the Constitution, the final authority on what the document meant. Intrinsically, the Supreme Court became as a matter of fact also as in theory an equal partner in authorities, and it has acted that role always later on (Erskine P.88-109).

William Marbury petitioned to U.S Supreme Court this caused the case. President John Adams appointed William Marbury in the District of Columbia as a Justice of peace. But afterward the commission was undelivered to him. When there was no delivery of commission then William Marbury submitted petitioned to force James Madison the secretary of state to deliver the documents, but the mater of turning was that Chief Justice of that time John Marshall refused the petition of Marbury. Justify his refused by claiming that the part of status on which he supported his claim was unconstitutional, Judiciary act of 1789 (Coxe, P.302-335).

Mile-Stone of case

Marbury v. Madison was the landmark decision assisted define the “checks and balances” of the American political system. It was the first time in the history of U.S Supreme Court that court declared something “unconstitutional,” and founded the conception of judicial review in the U.S. Judicial review means that court may supervise or declare void the practice of any government branch toward other one.

In the year of 1800 the presidential election conducted, John Adams was defeated by Thomas then Thomas Jefferson became the very first U.S President. But Jefferson didn’t joined office because the till 4 March, 1801, therefore until that time federalist and Adams were in power. At that time there was a Judiciary act of 1801 was passed by the congress. The Judiciary act of 1801 was formed by the modification the Act of 1789. Adman just before the end of his presidency committed an attempt against the future administration and democratic republic, Adman appointed forty two justices of peace offices and sixteen federal circuit judges the judiciary act of 1801. These appointments were ill famed all of these located in the Alexander and Washington area (Coxe, P.302-335).

Among these Federal peace judges one of them was Marbury; William Maryland was a financier and Maryland. There were two things which made Maryland nearer to Adams presidency that was his support and Mary land policies. William Marbury had been charged to the status of justice of the peace in the Columbia District. There was a five year term for a justice of the peace

The appointments were approved altogether by Senate on the following day. But still for the purpose to do to effect commissions had to be delivered. As soon the new president Thomas Jefferson charged the presidency order the acting Secretary of State James Madison, administrator’s attorney General Levi Lincoln prohibited to delivering the appointments which were remaining. In Jefferson’s opinion, it was void in case of the untimely (Randolph, P. 11-19).

There was a thing which should be noted that some of the commissions remained to delivered. This indicated that it was not possible to deliver all commissions before the expiry of the Adams’s presidency period. It was a fact that all of these appointments were fall in the nature of routine. After the Adam’s presidency Democratic-Republican congress reversed the previous by judiciary Act of 1802, therefore the branch of judicial again as the Act of 1789 dictated of the original Judiciary there was additional two annual sessions with one session.

The issue in Marbury v. Madison was that there are only 3 manners a case can be heard in the Supreme Court: firstly registering in the supreme court secondly registering in lower federal court for instance district court and the last way registering in a state court and appealing from highest court of the state, then attacking on supreme court on an problem of federal law the foremost one is the practice of court’s original jurisdiction, afterward of it both are practices of the appellate jurisdiction of Supreme Court.

Since the purpose of Marbury registered his petition for the mandamus instantly in the Supreme Court, the Court required being able to practice original legal power over the case in order that have the ability to hear it (Randolph, P. 11-19).

The argument of Marbury was that in the Judiciary Act of 1789, United States Congress allowed the Supreme Court of the United States original legal power over requests for mandamuses. This argument from the side of William Marbury arose various issues that had to address by Supreme Court of the United States. These issues were following

Firstly there was a question arose that Did a “floor” created by the constitution’s Article III, original legal power, which United States Congress can increase, or does it create an exhaustive list that Congress can’t modify at all? Secondly the question arose that if Article III’s

original legal power was a thoroughgoing list, but United States Congress tried to alter it in any case, who succeeds that battle, the Constitution or United States Congress? In the last but most especially, who is so-called to determine who succeeded? (Nelson, P.101-135)

In its respond to such the last question, the United States Supreme Court validates the impression of judicial review. Concisely, the issue regarding constitution upon which Marbury v. Madison was determined was whether United States Congress could flourish the original legal power of the Supreme Court (Tushnet, P.185-205).

There was a complete decision by the court on by the court on February 24, 1803 the decision was made by all of four without any unmatched decision means out of four judges all made the same 4-0, all judges declared that Williams Marbury had the privilege for the delivered of commission but the supreme court had no authority to push Madison for the purpose to deliver the commission to Williams Marbury or some one else. John Marshall the chief justice wrote the legal document stating the reasons for a judicial decision of the court; the case was presented as arousing three different questions by the Chief justice John Marshall (Nelson, P.101-135).

First question was whether Williams Marbury had a right to the commission? Secondly either the practices of states law gave Marbury a legal means to recover a right. Thirdly whether demanding the Supreme Court for a mandamus the correct legal means to recover a right? John Marshall the Chief justice quickly replied the starting both questions in the form of positive. John Marshall discovered that the un-success to deliver the commission was “offend against of a vested legal right” (Tushnet, P.185-205).


The justices enforced, by the forceful arguments of chief justice John Marshall’s, that on the final issue the U.S. Constitution was “the central and predominant law of the state” and that “an behave of the law-makers disgusting to the U.S. Constitution is invalidate.” Put differently, when the nation’s highest law – Constitution battles with an work or act of the law-makers, that work or act is void. This case creates the Supreme Court’s authority of judicial review.

Work cited

Nelson, William Edward; 2008; “Marbury v. Madison: the origins and legacy of judicial review”; University Press of Kansas; ISBN 0700610618, 9780700610617 P.101-135

Coxe, Brinton; 2005; “An essay on judicial power and unconstitutional legislation: being a commentary on parts of the Constitution of the United States”

The Law book Exchange, Ltd; ISBN1584775343, 9781584775348; P.302-335

Tushnet, Mark; 2005; “Arguing Marbury versus Madison”; Stanford University Press, ISBN0804752273, 9780804752275; P.185-205

Naden, Corinne; Blue; Rose; 2004; “Marbury V. Madison: The Court’s Foundation Supreme Court milestones” Marshall Cavendish; ISBN0761418407, 9780761418405 P.90-120

Randolph, Ryan; 2003; “Marbury V. Madison: The New Supreme Court Gets More Power Life in the new American nation” The Rosen Publishing Group; ISBN0823940349, 9780823940349 P. 11-19

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *